Search found 641 matches
- Fri May 22, 2026 1:47 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: SysLog issue
- Replies: 2
- Views: 505
Re: SysLog issue
This is looking like an issue with our network. Some modules (54415) work and some don't, all built with v2.9.5. Sorry about that.
- Thu May 21, 2026 11:29 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: SysLog issue
- Replies: 2
- Views: 505
SysLog issue
I encountered bizarre behavior with the SysLog() function. If the provided string contains any commas, nothing is transmitted.
For example, this works:
SysLog(“test1 test2”);
This sends nothing:
SysLog(“test1,test2”);
Likewise, this sends nothing:
SysLog(“,”);
This sends nothing, and also ...
For example, this works:
SysLog(“test1 test2”);
This sends nothing:
SysLog(“test1,test2”);
Likewise, this sends nothing:
SysLog(“,”);
This sends nothing, and also ...
- Thu Feb 19, 2026 11:03 am
- Forum: NetBurner's Eclipse IDE
- Topic: java error on new PC and legacy eclipse
- Replies: 8
- Views: 46869
Re: java error on new PC and legacy eclipse
Should using a modified makefile from one of the examples work with v2.9.5 of the tools? Because it doesn't work for me.
Not only that, but after running the makefile I went back to Eclipse to build my app and now I get error:
Build Error
Generated resource conflict
two resources of the same name ...
Not only that, but after running the makefile I went back to Eclipse to build my app and now I get error:
Build Error
Generated resource conflict
two resources of the same name ...
- Thu Nov 13, 2025 8:37 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: OpenSSL version
- Replies: 4
- Views: 26183
Re: OpenSSL version
Is it possible to do a salted sha-256 hash for image signing? I understand salting, I just don't understand how it would work in an embedded system.
- Wed Sep 03, 2025 8:24 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: OpenSSL version
- Replies: 4
- Views: 26183
Re: OpenSSL version
We are not using certificates. All we are doing is signing the firmware image using the private key created by OpenSSL.
The only reason this is coming up is because a customer is concerned that we used a version of OpenSSL that is out-of-date and no longer supported. At the time we started signing ...
The only reason this is coming up is because a customer is concerned that we used a version of OpenSSL that is out-of-date and no longer supported. At the time we started signing ...
- Fri Aug 29, 2025 1:32 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: OpenSSL version
- Replies: 4
- Views: 26183
OpenSSL version
For signing firmware images, we are using OpenSSL v1.1.1f, which I think was provided by Netburner. It's been about 4-years since we started signing images. In any case, is it possible to use the current version of OpenSSL, which I think is v3.5.0, to create the private/public key pair?
Am I ...
Am I ...
- Mon Jul 07, 2025 8:31 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: TcpUpdate Error
- Replies: 7
- Views: 213227
Re: TcpUpdate Error
It turns out I was calling StartTcpUpdate at two different locations in my code. I'm running out of feet to shoot.
- Mon Jun 30, 2025 3:26 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: TcpUpdate Error
- Replies: 7
- Views: 213227
Re: TcpUpdate Error
It turns out the return code for OSTaskCreatewName is defined in OSTaskCreate. And error code of 40 mean the task priority is already used.
These are my priorities:
#define USERMAIN_PRIO (55)
#define NTP_TASK_PRIO (54)
#define UDP_TASK_PRIO (53)
#define SNMP_PRIO (52)
#define FTP_TASK_PRIO (51 ...
These are my priorities:
#define USERMAIN_PRIO (55)
#define NTP_TASK_PRIO (54)
#define UDP_TASK_PRIO (53)
#define SNMP_PRIO (52)
#define FTP_TASK_PRIO (51 ...
- Mon Jun 30, 2025 12:42 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: TcpUpdate Error
- Replies: 7
- Views: 213227
Re: TcpUpdate Error
StartTcpUpdate just calls OSTaskCreatewName, and returns the value returned by OSTaskCreatewName. But the uCosLibrary document doesn't define any return values.
- Mon Jun 30, 2025 11:33 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: TcpUpdate Error
- Replies: 7
- Views: 213227
Re: TcpUpdate Error
Well, this is embarrassing. It is in my code. It's generated when function StartTcpUpdate returns a non-zero value, which in this case is 40.