On my MOD5282 units, I enable the watchdog. So if I want to work at the nb> prompt I have to disable it straight away after a reboot, by typing
setup
w
x
which disables the watchdog and allows use of the commands such as fla.
There's about 6 seconds to do this, which is plenty once you get used to ...
Search found 7 matches
- Tue Dec 09, 2014 2:08 am
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Did you 'brick' your MOD5441X or NANO54415? Look here...
- Replies: 33
- Views: 66927
- Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:49 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: App Header Failed
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4572
Re: App Header Failed
I write to the UserParams area as follows:-
1. After a code update has occured, immediately after ReadS19ApplicationCodeFromStream has returned STREAM_UP_OK (so this is about a minute after power up, and only if a code update has occured)
2. Soon after power up, if the UserParams content is not ...
1. After a code update has occured, immediately after ReadS19ApplicationCodeFromStream has returned STREAM_UP_OK (so this is about a minute after power up, and only if a code update has occured)
2. Soon after power up, if the UserParams content is not ...
- Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:40 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: App Header Failed
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4572
Re: App Header Failed
I'm only writing 0x36C bytes to the area starting at 0xFFC06000, and it's the same for all variants, so this shouldn't be a problem. I've checked this with debug iprintf statements.
I've been digging down into the library functions to try to see where my problem is coming from, in case something ...
I've been digging down into the library functions to try to see where my problem is coming from, in case something ...
- Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:23 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: App Header Failed
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4572
App Header Failed
What exactly does "App Header Failed" (followed by "No Valid App") mean, when displayed by the Monitor?
Background (details obscured for confidentiality reasons):-
I have a project of some 600 individual units, each contains a MOD5282 module on a custom main processor card. There are two variants ...
Background (details obscured for confidentiality reasons):-
I have a project of some 600 individual units, each contains a MOD5282 module on a custom main processor card. There are two variants ...
- Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:04 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Implementation of VLAN/IEEE802.1Q
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5791
Implementation of VLAN/IEEE802.1Q
Is there any plan for Netburner to add support for IEEE 802.1Q (Virtual LAN)?
We're tendering for a project where VLAN support would be useful.
Looking at various websites such as Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q it appears to be a case of inserting a four byte block after the ...
We're tendering for a project where VLAN support would be useful.
Looking at various websites such as Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q it appears to be a case of inserting a four byte block after the ...
- Wed Aug 18, 2010 2:33 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: FTP Client problem
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4012
Re: FTP Client problem
Thanks, Paul, I think that might be the problem. We have a fixed IP address on the Netburner and so the test code will execute in the same time each time it runs from a hardware reset.
As you say it probably won't be a problem on a real system. We'll see how it goes.
As you say it probably won't be a problem on a real system. We'll see how it goes.
- Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:36 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: FTP Client problem
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4012
FTP Client problem
I'm looking at running an FTP Client on our MOD5282 system to get some config data off a nearby server. We've started out by running the FTP_Client example code, but it seems to have a problem.
To start with it runs perfectly OK. If we quickly do a reset, to make it run the code again, it fails to ...
To start with it runs perfectly OK. If we quickly do a reset, to make it run the code again, it fails to ...